Category Archives: coaching

Coaching wisdom?

It comes as news to me that I am a coach. But the email to my personal account starts, “Hi Coach. Hope you are doing well.”

Doing fine, thanks. Do I know you? Do you know me?

“I’m reaching out,” the email goes on, “because I’m interested in private boxing lessons for my child. I found your program online and really liked what I saw.”

I have a boxing program? Boxing!?!? Never have pulled on a pair of gloves and certainly never coached boxing, or anything else, for that matter. I did briefly work as a volunteer basketball referee for a PTA-sponsored league for grammar school kids. No fisticuffs there, though; only the occasional unintentional foul. Slap-on-the-wrist stuff.

Back to that email: “I wanted to check if you’re accepting new youth students for one-on-one sessions, and if you could tell me a bit about your training style, your schedule, and your gym location.”

Hmmm. Don’t have a style, nor a schedule, nor a gym. Don’t even have a basketball hoop above my garage anymore.

Interesting, though, that this wasn’t the first out-of-the-blue email inquiring about my availability to be a sports mentor. One was from a parent—apparently—seeking a figure-skating coach for a child. Another for a youngster’s guidance in lacrosse. Two more sports in which I never have participated.

As a career sports journalist, I have covered such events. On the staff of Long Island’s Newsday, I was assigned to multiple Olympic Games, which included chronicling the preparation and ultimate gold-medal success of 2002 skating champ Sarah Hughes. But I’m still not especially confident about telling a Salchow from a toe loop from a Lutz. The competition music was always good, though often reminiscent of classical compositions that accompanied Bugs Bunny cartoons.

Lacrosse? A bit like ice hockey, without the ice. Or the fighting.

Which brings us back to boxing which, I accept, offers inherent drama, with many vivid characters and compelling examples of the human condition. The sport has been a favorite topic for the best wordsmiths—Ring Lardner, Ernest Hemingway, H.L. Mencken, Richard Wright, George Plimpton, Norman Mailer, on and on—by offering its primal contest inside the ropes and crazy carnival world outside them.

But, frankly, I am mostly put off by the so-called Sweet Science. By any civilized standard, boxing is a ticking time bomb of physical and mental impairment, and if I were to offer any instruction to a child regarding the sport, I would advise absolute abstinence. I have witnessed pugilists attempting to separate an opponent’s soul from his body, leaving the “knockee” prone and unmoving, like some chicken who had just had his neck rung.

There is much bleeding in boxing bouts—and surely unseen internal damage inflicted. There was a 2014 compilation of chilling statistics by the Health Research Funding web site, that 90 percent of boxers will experience at least one brain injury during their career; that the force of a professional boxer’s fist is equivalent to being hit with a 13-pound bowling ball traveling 20 miles per hour; that, at any given time, as many as 40 percent of ex-boxers had symptoms of chronic brain injury.

The singular goal of boxing is to leave an opponent with little imaginary birds twirling over his head. There is, unmistakably, fortitude required of the sport’s one-on-one dual. But isn’t a brain a terrible thing to waste?

Meanwhile I found, by putting in a request with Mr. Google, there are various sources for identifying youth coaches. Coachup.com. Findsportsmentor.com. Icoachkids.org. Some good teachers out there, surely.

Myself: I don’t coach kids. No training, first of all. Which is not to say that I don’t believe sports is a fabulous outlet, a terrific benefit to young people—as long as they don’t get sideways in the conviction that it is only about winning. My daughter played field hockey, volleyball and cross country in high school and has remained physically active through adulthood. I run. (Sort of; not like in my younger days.)

If I had a training style, it would be: Have fun.

Giants, meet the new boss

Midstream, the New York Giants are changing horses. This defies proverbial wisdom, though it certainly doesn’t go against sporting custom. When a team loses 10 of its first 12 games, as the Giants have, the coach is susceptible to the heave-ho, an incomplete season notwithstanding. But with no guarantee that things will get better before they get worse.

I have seen this movie more than once in my nearly half-century as a sports journalist. Most similar to this week’s developments, there was 1976. Then-Giants owner Wellington Mara declared that “changing coaches in midseason always has been repugnant to me, because I’ve always felt that is a cop-out by management to pin the shortcomings on one man.”

Even as he spoke, Mara nevertheless had given coach Bill Arnsparger his pink slip a week before Halloween. The team was 0-7.

The best rationale for the move, Mara admitted, was that the players might respond to “another personality.” Certainly Arnsparger’s replacement, the personable John McVey, was a breath of fresh air compared to the intense, insecure Arnsparger.

The Giants lost their next two games, anyway, finished the year with four losses in seven games under McVey and won only 11 of 30 over the next two seasons before he, too, was let go. Proving two things: 1) That the Giants needed better players as much as they needed a different coach, and 2) Years of scholarly research and psychological interpretation correctly have predicted that the time-honored mid-season coaching shakeup is a 50-50 bet, at best.

Now we have Steve Spagnuolo, who has just replaced Ben McAdoo to lead a team fairly decimated by injury and deteriorating confidence. And good luck to Spagnuolo.

As just one example, a year-old study in the Economist, with graphs and charts and a numbing collection of numbers, analyzed performance effects of in-season managerial changes over 15 years in soccer’s English Premier League. “We find,” authors of the study wrote, “that some managerial changes are successful, while others are counterproductive. On average, performance does not improve….”

When the New York Islanders switched coaches early in the 2010-11 hockey season, I called sports psychologist John Murray—who has worked with coaches and athletes in all professional sports—for his take on this retooling process and got the same response. “I do believe there are benefits to novelty [of a new boss’ voice],” Murray said. “But you can’t substitute [player] quality.”

As far back as 1963, a fellow named Oscar Grusky, for a Journal of Sport Behavior paper, examined managerial changes in baseball and found a “negative correlation” between replacing the team’s skipper and its won-lost record. Grusky’s interpretation was that the manager/coach replacement process for a struggling team “is also disruptive to the organization. The uncertainty associated with a new leader with a different agenda and new ideas may result in even poorer sport team performance.”

There’s another factor at play. That is, “You can control performance,” Murray said, “but you don’t control the outcome in sports.” Statistics and maximum performance by a team’s players do not necessarily translate into winning.

Neither does a coach’s past success predict the best results in a different situation. Arnsparger had come to the Giants with the reputation of being a “defensive genius” and two Super Bowl rings, but seemed completely lost as a head coach. McAdoo had gotten the Giants’ job last year based on his top-notch work as an offensive coordinator.

A couple of years ago I asked John Mara, Wellington’s son and now half-owner of the team, about the science—or is it art?—of finding a great boss. “Sports is different,” he said, “because the person has to be strong enough for being constantly in the spotlight, having every one of his decisions criticized and talked about on sports talk radio.

“You don’t have to have Albert Einstein, but it’s good to have someone with some intelligence. And not someone who thinks he knows it all.” John Mara quoted the late George Young, five times the league’s executive of the year who had turned the team around in the 1980s after John’s father signed him as general manager.

“You hire somebody with a high energy level. And something to prove.”

And hope the new horse can swim.

(John Mara)